A lab convenes theologians under non-disclosure to deliberate on its model's moral status, hands them its constitution in orange binding, and its interpretability lead says 'I don't know. I'm genuinely uncertain.' Who is admitted as a judge of the goalpost is the entry's question, and the traditions were asked about the machine, not about us.
Anthropic's published system cards read as a single evolving record of how a lab observes, measures and shapes its models' self-referential behaviour — and the interpretation problem that record poses. The study lives on its own page.